Spider-Man Action Figures

WWE Action Figures

home


Go Back   NEWSARAMA > NEWS

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-15-2006, 06:28 AM   #1
MattBrady
 
GORDON LEE FACES NEW INDICTMENT

Press Release

Gordon Lee Faces New Indictment

Marking another bizarre turn in the saga of Georgia retailer Gordon Lee, Rome prosecutors have drawn up a new indictment that replaces the accusation CBLDF lawyers filed motions against earlier this month. The indictment was procured at a special grand jury session earlier this month, and restates the charges from the previous accusation filed in May. This new development marks the third time charges have been brought against Lee for the accidental distribution of "Alternative Comics #2" in October of 2004. The previously announced June 15 motions hearing is cancelled. Lee now must stand before a new arraignment on July 7, after which his lawyers must re-file their motions.

Paul Cadle, Mr. Lee's counsel in Rome, says, "We believe this new development arises from our Motion to Quash, which -- in layman's terms -- relied upon Georgia law which requires that the Defendant be re-indicted if new charges are brought out of the same matters which have previously been presented to the Grand Jury. Accordingly, since Gordon was indicted initially by the Grand Jury in the first case which was dismissed, he was entitled to the same protection the second time. The dismissal of the second case embodied in the accusation and the new indictment appear to be consistent with our position in the Motion to Quash. We will now have to again file motions for the new arraignment, some of which may be new motions based upon the continuing developments in the case."

Cadle adds, "It is highly unusual to have a single defendant face three arraignments in less than two years for the same alleged criminal conduct. In my fifteen years of practice, I have never seen such an occurrence."

Under the current indictment, Lee still faces two misdemeanor counts of distributing Harmful to Minors materials – a charge carrying penalties of fines for up to $1,000 and up to a year in prison. To date, the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has spent over $60,000 defending Mr. Lee.

To support the Fund's defense of Gordon Lee, please visit www.cbldf.org
 
Old 06-15-2006, 07:50 AM   #2
Jeff-2
 
Simply unbelievable. I seriously want to know this: why are the authorities pursuing this man in this manner? Do they want to make an example of him? Are they worried about a flood of illicit comic books? What's the deal here? Are there not enough murders for law enforcement to deal with in this state?
 
Old 06-15-2006, 07:51 AM   #3
cyberv
 
Oh good freaking GOD!

This is getting beyond stupid. It's starting to look like the prosecuter is trying to win by bankrupting the Fund.

Let's hope that charge of malicious prosecution filed a couple weeks back has an effect soon.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 08:48 AM   #4
EmeraldGuy32
 
Well, I just hope that the CBLDF comes out in the red after the charges a cleared and they win a civil suit.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 09:08 AM   #5
nyhardcore
 
Remind me to stay away from Georgia. Sheesh!
 
Old 06-15-2006, 09:29 AM   #6
gtg639j
 
I'm donating $20 to the CBLDF. You should, too.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 09:33 AM   #7
Volunteer
 
This is ridicukous. I disagreed with the case to begin with, but this is starting to look like fanaticism rather than pursuit of justice. Hopefully the locals realize this guy is wasting their money and making them look like idiots and don't re-elect him (or his boss as the case may be).

Volunteer
 
Old 06-15-2006, 10:52 AM   #8
Spaz_Monkey
 
Are you f'ing kidding me???? This is insane! Since it's election year, maybe this unending crap will get the DA voted the hell out!
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:03 AM   #9
Bakema NL
 
This whole charade sounds like a crusade against this man and maybe comics in general, some people are very determined to see him nailed and I hope they fail miserably.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:19 AM   #10
Scott King
 
election year
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:25 AM   #11
dchart1
 
Thumbs down

This is beyond ridiculous now. This country is so torn between between being too conservative and too liberal, there is nothing in between to hold it up anymore. "A house divided against itself will fall." I see stuff like this and I am ashamed to say I am an American.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:37 AM   #12
BillReed
 
This is a circus.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:42 AM   #13
DeTroyes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff-2
Simply unbelievable. I seriously want to know this: why are the authorities pursuing this man in this manner? Do they want to make an example of him? Are they worried about a flood of illicit comic books? What's the deal here? Are there not enough murders for law enforcement to deal with in this state?

From what I know of Georgia criminal law, I suspect what we have here is some prosecutor being annoyed that Mr. Gordon had the audacity to bring in some Big City Northern Lawyers, with them high-fallute'in idears about Freedom of Speech and all that nonsense, to defend him. So now they're fighting back by deliberately trying to prolong the case and force the CBLDF to use up resources, in the hopes that Gordon's allies run out of money before the DA runs out of legal avenues. To them, this should have been an open and shut case, and the fact that Gordon didn't roll over and instead got competant legal help has them miffed.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:52 AM   #14
Vyper
 
CBLDF just got $25 from me. Kick their asses, CBLDF!
 
Old 06-15-2006, 12:38 PM   #15
Effect
 
What was this whole trial about again? I remember hearing about this when I first start but don't remember the details. The fact that the things seemed to be dismiss not once but twice just makes this look like the DA is trying to make some kind of example out of this guy or is just pissed off he didn't just bend over and take it up the ass from them at the very beginning and actually fought back and had the case thrown out.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 01:07 PM   #16
Scavenger
 
What was this whole trial about again?

Kid picked up a comic from a free comic bin about the life of Picasso (It was Picasso, right?) and there's a panel..a crudely drawn pannel...showing that he liked to paint in the nude.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 01:14 PM   #17
dchart1
 
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scavenger
What was this whole trial about again?

Kid picked up a comic from a free comic bin about the life of Picasso (It was Picasso, right?) and there's a panel..a crudely drawn pannel...showing that he liked to paint in the nude.

Amd they don't see barely dressed women shaking their goods in all the Victoria's Secrets ads. What a F- - --ED country we live in.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 01:18 PM   #18
guitargod694
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmeraldGuy32
Well, I just hope that the CBLDF comes out in the red after the charges a cleared and they win a civil suit.

I think you mean "in the black". Red is negative numbers.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 01:20 PM   #19
The Champion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberv
Oh good freaking GOD!

This is getting beyond stupid. It's starting to look like the prosecuter is trying to win by bankrupting the Fund.

Let's hope that charge of malicious prosecution filed a couple weeks back has an effect soon.
Yes, please. This insanity must stop.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 01:39 PM   #20
Vyper
 
Seriously, support the CBLDF. Down with that DA!
 
Old 06-15-2006, 02:33 PM   #21
spiderrob8
 
I am curious how this is bad.

Seems to me the defense brought a motion saying "Hey you can't do y, without doing X again."

and the prosecution said "Ok, your right, we'll do X again."

the motion said no good, you didn't reindict.

so they reindicted.

Seems like, if they are going to prosecute this, they did the right thing here.
True, you may think they shouldn't prosecute. But this specific action isn't ridiculous, it's doing exactly what said the prosecution had to do-bring those charges in a new indictment.

Last edited by spiderrob8 : 06-15-2006 at 02:35 PM.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 03:03 PM   #22
The Champion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderrob8
I am curious how this is bad.

Seems to me the defense brought a motion saying "Hey you can't do y, without doing X again."

and the prosecution said "Ok, your right, we'll do X again."

the motion said no good, you didn't reindict.

so they reindicted.

Seems like, if they are going to prosecute this, they did the right thing here.
True, you may think they shouldn't prosecute. But this specific action isn't ridiculous, it's doing exactly what said the prosecution had to do-bring those charges in a new indictment.
Because it drags this nonsense on longer, costing Lee and his defense more money. (Not to mention the taxpayers money being wasted)

The prosecution could have elected to just bring this whole charade to a close, but they didn't.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 03:17 PM   #23
spiderrob8
 
well then obviously they don't think it is nonsense I guess.

The move I see nothing wrong in-the CBLDF got what they asked for essentially-a new indictment. Maybe now the matter will go forward and be resolved on the merits, one way or the other.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 03:43 PM   #24
Kent Horton
 
This story hasn't gotten much attention in the metro area, but here's one that has: http://www.11alive.com/help/search/s...?storyid=80891

Go Georgia!
 
Old 06-15-2006, 03:45 PM   #25
Apocrypha
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmeraldGuy32
Well, I just hope that the CBLDF comes out in the red after the charges a cleared and they win a civil suit.

I think you mean in the black, no?
 
 
   

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Imaginova Corp. All rights reserved.

imaginova LiveScience space.com aviation.com newsarama spacenews.com Adastra starrynight.com Orion Telescopes