Quote:
|
Originally Posted by X-punged
Three posts in a little less than a day.
Not a good sign if you're gaging interest.
Iron-man had better pay off on Marvel's investment cause there doesn't seem to be a lot of positive indicators for the Hulk.
|
As much as I'm excited by the Hulk and Iron Man (I'll see both on the first day of opening), I have to reluctantly agree with your sentiments.
I think the main problem with Hulk has been timing - bad move to put two major Marvel films on in cinemas in the same year, but only weeks apart from each other!!! Really, any product like this should have at least a six month barrier between each other - not only are they competing with Batman, but with each other? Not very smart...
Secondly, Iron Man has been getting most of the publicity - and Downey Jr. has been an absolutely fantastic spokesman for the film (I've yet to see such a charming, down-to-earth, self deprecating person as he in a long time). And where is Norton? Nowhere in sight, which is really, really bad practice. If the star of the film isn't promoting their own film, why would the main audience go to see it?
Anyway... at least we'll have two Hulk fims for prosperity.
