The Great Graphic Novels LIST is not an award, really, but a list of excellent graphic novels that librarians think teens will like. And in fact, the librarians on the committee do get teens to read the graphic novels and give them feedback. I was the chairperson of the task force that created the list and committee for YALSA. YA librarians serve a wide range of ages, from as young as 11 to as old as 19. When one considers the variety of maturity levels among young people in that age range, it can boggle the mind. So yes, Kyle Baker's Nat Turner is bloody, but I consider it appropriate for readers in high school. I would, of course, caution teachers to read it and consider whether it will be appropriate for their students. But definitely older teens in junior and senior years of high school should be able to handle the violence. After all, this is history, not just mindlessly violent horror. And I think that was Baker's point - history can be bloody and horrible, but we can't shut our eyes to it and ignore it.
If anyone would like to see the 2007 list of Great Graphic Novels for Teens, you can go to
http://www.ala.org/yalsa/booklistsaw...orteens/gn.cfm and click on the link for "2007 Great Graphic Novels."
And yes, .V., librarians tend to be on the cutting edge of literature - I was promoting graphic novels for libraries back in 1984, and I wasn't the first one by any means.
BTW, graphic novels selected for the Great Graphic Novels for Teens list will NOT all be titles appropriate for school library collections. Lots of teens with more mature mindsets can and will read titles that have mature content. I was reading adult books since I was 10 years old (I was a bit precocious that way) - with my parents' approval.