by Steve Ekstrom
SPOILER WARNING FOR X-MEN #199
X-Men #199 hit shelves this week—with a couple of well placed swerves involving Rogue and Cable and their status quo with Marvel’s Band of Merry Mutants. Also, readers will notice that the last page of the this issue contains a full image of David Finch’s super-sized gatefold for next month’s 200th anniversary issue—with two smaller images below it: one is Chris Bachalo artwork featuring the X-Men and the other is a Humberto Ramos rendered image of…well, let’s just say that apparently, Mr. Sinister has been a busy, busy super villain.
Fearful and full of questions, Newsarama cautiously flagged down Mike Carey in the middle of the night last night. Carey has got a lot “not to say” about next months X-anniversary and the re-emergence of the one of the deadliest groups to actually rival the X-Men—the Marauders.
Newsarama: Getting right to it—Rogue seems to be suffering quite a bit—with her tactile powers amplified by Pandemic and Strain 88. At the end of
X-Men #199, there was a very disturbing moment where Rogue indicates that she has the "urge" to touch something—care to elaborate? Are you returning this tragic character to her traditional roots?
Mike Carey: In some ways, yeah; but please bear in mind, Rogue is only partway through a long and harrowing journey. By the time we get to #207 and the end of the crossover, she'll be in a different place and a lot of things we've been throwing up into the air will be more clearly defined. She does come out changed—profoundly changed—but we're not just testing her to destruction and we're not just saying "Oh, we'll take what's there already and multiply it by a few billion times...". There's more to it than that. There's a sense in which the way this plays out will become—I hope will become—one of the most poignant and powerful beats of the crossover.
NRAMA: Cable has lost his telepathy and regained his telekinesis—this has been a prevalent theme over the past ten years in the X books—the juxtaposition of telepathy and telekinesis—how characters tend to have one door open when another door closes. Care to elaborate on this?
MC: Well, you know how it is yourself when you telekinetically lift up a cup of coffee or something and then realize your telepathy has cut out. It's a bummer, but it happens all the time. (laugh)
No, seriously, I think it's an instance of the Phoenix effect. A character who is both telepathic and telekinetic is a spectacularly powerful—almost irresistible—force. From a narrative point of view, that's a lot less interesting than a power that brings its own problems, or a power for which there's a price to pay.
NRAMA: The teaser image on the last page of
X-Men #199 was pretty shocking—the Marauders are coming back, looming larger than ever. Their roster seems to actually match even the most bloated roster of heroes in modern comic books—the X-Men have more members than a football team! Let's play a word association game with some of the members of this incarnation of the Marauders.
Let’s start with—Scalphunter.
MC: An honorable man once—a monster now. An untold story.
NRAMA: Exodus.
MC: Idealistic, well-meaning and terrifying.
NRAMA: Gambit.
MC: Which way is he going, up or down? We just don't know.
NRAMA: Sunfire.
MC: All of Shiro's worst personality traits are coming to the fore in this story arc.
NRAMA: Malice.
MC: As viciously playful as ever—but she's got a brand new bag.
NRAMA: Lady Mastermind.
MC: ...finally gets to stop playing nice. It comes as a relief to her.
NRAMA: Random.
MC: Only in this for one reason. We don't yet know what the reason is.
NRAMA: Omega Sentinel.
MC: Yeah, what's going on there? The answer is actually above.
NRAMA: Obviously, there are several X-related turncoats, without naming M
all the names (the picture will suffice), was this assault on the 'X' premeditated?

MC: For the longest time. The seeds were planted before I joined the book, if you look carefully enough. And when the Marauders make their move, it's not
one move—it's a carefully orchestrated sequence of moves. By the time the X-Men realize what's happening, the bad guys are already into the end-game. But the stakes don't get revealed fully until the crossover.
NRAMA: What is your take on Sinister? Nobody is re-inventing the wheel here—but how is your Sinister going to make a lasting mark on the status quo of the post-
House of M X-books?
MC: Well, as you say, we know what kind of a man Sinister is and we know a lot by this time about how his mind works. He's been pondering on the question of mutant extinction, and he's come up with a possible solution: and being Sinister, he's being horrifically careful and thorough in terms of making absolutely sure that things happen the way he wants and needs them to. He's left nothing to chance, and he's moving the key figures around like pawns on a chess board. But even a master strategist can't predict how everyone will react every time: there will be one or two ducks that don't fall into a row for him—two actually.
Here we really are re-stating the character as he's already been defined. This is Sinister as we know and hate him, trampling lives underfoot in pursuit of a goal that becomes all-consuming for him as soon as he adopts it.
NRAMA: Sabertooth seems to have escaped the events of
X-Men #199 unharmed—will he be showing up in
X-Men #200? If so, will he be showing his true colors?
MC: No, he won't be in #200: his story plays out in
Cable and Deadpool and in
Wolverine. But yeah, we get to see Creed being Creed again. Not that he ever stopped.
NRAMA: In the teaser image—Gambit has been returned to his traditional look that was abandoned during his tenure as ‘Death, Fourth Horseman of Apocalypse’ during Peter Milligan’s run on the title. Will you shed light on this transformation?
MC: It's a statement he's making. He explains why in #200. And that explanation opens up a couple of other questions.
NRAMA: With the addition of Exodus to this version of the Marauders--is Scalphunter still the leader? Exodus is kind of a bad ass, you know…
MC: Neither Exodus nor Scalphunter is the Marauders' operational leader. That honor goes to... someone else—someone surprising. Exodus kind of acts as a lieutenant— keeping order within his own Acolytes—who are almost a team-within-a-team.
NRAMA:
X-Men: Endangered Species #1 hits stores June 20th followed by
X-Men #200 on June 27th. The first "Endangered Species" back-up story is featured in
X-Men #200--Beast is featured prominently—with the advent of Whedon and Cassaday's run on
Astonishing X-Men ending—do you and Ed Brubaker have 'carte blanche' with that roster? Who are some characters from the other X-books that you want to draft to your X-Men?
MC: Don't get me started. No, I don't think we have carte blanche, but there are going to be borrowings both short-term and long-term. I'd kill for Beast and Cyclops, but who wouldn't? I think you could call that justifiable homicide. I wouldn't mind taking a crack at Madrox at some point, too, but Peter has made that character so much his own...
NRAMA: Who are some characters that you wanted but the Powers That Be said, "No, but maybe later,"?
MC: Psylocke's the main one. Mister Claremont had first dibs because, you know, he invented her. As far as the post-crossover roster is concerned, the pieces are still falling into place. That's one of the things we're going to be discussing at the creative retreat at the back end of June.
NRAMA: 2007 seems to be a crappy year to be a hero in the Marvel Universe—all the toe tags are starting to pile up. Want to give readers a hint as to who bites it in
X-Men #200?
MC: No, I can't do that. But the character in question goes out with a very big bang—and dying doesn't always mean you lost the fight.
NRAMA: What are your thoughts on killing characters—should they be brought back creatively or should they stay dead? Is death a tool for eliminating baggage in a comic book or is it something else?
MC: Oh well, you know, death in comics is often a career move. It can buy you out of one contract and leave you free to pick up another. I'm not saying that's what we're doing here, but I'm sure you're familiar with the phenomenon.
There's no point in killing a character off if it doesn't answer a narrative purpose that wouldn't be better served by something else. Whatever the question is, death ought to be the answer of last resort. Otherwise you're contributing to a sort of conceptual inflation, where your imaginative dollar buys you less each time.
NRAMA: Are you going to be working the X end of the Marvel Universe for the foreseeable future?
MC: God laughs when we make plans—and I say that as an atheist. I want to be involved. I love the franchise and I love the characters. And I think this is a great time to be doing this—an ‘X-Renaissance’. As long as Marvel wants me, I'm here.
NRAMA: To close, give readers one sentence that will make them want to buy every issue of this entire event.
MC: Well all the nude scenes are artistically necessary: except the one with Lady Mastermind in the bath—that's just gratuitous.
No? Sorry. How about
:
Everything that's been building in all the X-books since
House of M—every last, solitary thing—comes together and gets resolved here, right in front of your eyes.