
20 years ago, Marv Wolfman and George Perez redefined the entire DC Universe with
Crisis on Infinite Earths, a 12 issue event that pulled together multiple earths, streamlined continuity, saw dozens of characters die, dozens more fully join the DCU, and in the end, become a legend among DC fans.
In April, for the first time since the story came out, Wolfman will revisit the
entire Crisis storyline in a 320 page novelization, to be published by iBooks. This version of
Crisis won’t be a simple retelling of the comic book series in any way. We spoke with Wolfman for a look between the covers, as well as a look back at the original material.
Newsarama: First off, how did you end up with this gig?
Marv Wolfman: I was having breakfast with John Nee of DC Comics at the San Diego Convention two years ago and John asked if I'd be interested in doing the Crisis as a novel. Without thinking I said yes. Later I realized the daunting nature of the job.
NRAMA: So you walked into this, eyes open with no hesitation? After all, you had really only revisited the material once in 20 years, with
Crisis #4.5. Did you feel any urge to just let the material stand as the first and last word on it?
MW: When I first said ‘yes,’ I didn't think much about it. I just thought it would be cool. Later on I realized it wasn't as simple as I first thought. I wasn't worried about revisiting the material, I was worried about how. I knew I couldn't just do a prose version of the story because as they say, one picture is worth a thousand words and the original comic was conceived to be a visual book. Back then, I was working not only with my
Titans partner and friend, and George Perez's work on
Titans was some of the best stuff he had ever done. So I realized then I had to come up with an entirely new approach to the story, to do something that would work best in prose as the comic worked best with writing and art.
NRAMA: So how did you approach it? Did you go back to your original scripts and notes, the comics, or what?
MW: I had to re-read
Crisis for the first time ever. After I first wrote it I never re-read the entire series. I'd re-read the books when each issue came out but I never re-read the whole book because quite frankly it was such a nightmare to produce I wanted nothing to do with the series or its political problems for a long time to come.
NRAMA: What was so bad about it for you? Did you just not want to bring up the emotions and stress of the creative process again, or were there other reasons?
MW: There were a lot of political problems at the time. Strangely enough, not with the business folk who actually got the project and understood what we were trying to do, but with a lot of the creative and editorial staff, many of whom didn't realize the world had changed and we either had to evolve or go extinct. Remember that at the time DC sales were tanking and Marvel was growing - so it wasn't like today where all sales are pretty much down and level. Except for
Titans, Marvel fans didn't cross over to DC. Something had to be done. The idea of a crossover series had never been done before and editors at the time were extremely hesitant to participate, even when told they had to. I tried to keep things moving along, telling them that things were changing so please help shape the new DC, but dealing with everyone on this was very difficult. Of course, I have the tendency to be pretty blunt so I'm sure I contributed to it, too.
NRAMA: Did any of this have to do with what you’ve said previously was your original version of how
Crisis should have ended, that is, an entirely new DC Universe, full of characters and heroes more representative of the modern world in terms of diversity and content?
MW: That was a problem - and in retrospect I think I was proven right - Dick Giordano in his autobiography said he wished there was the talent available at the time to do what I suggested. But that was only one symptom. Trying to do something that was so new and different had many, many of its own difficulties. Today's readers were born into the post-
Crisis world where crossovers and stunts is the norm. It wasn't like that then. For better or worse.
NRAMA: Back to your approach, and re-reading the story for the first time ever. If you only re-read it for the novel, what about
Crisis #4.5? What was your research like for that?
MW: When I did
Crisis #4.5 a few years ago, I knew where I wanted that story placed and I re-read up till issue #5 and skimmed the rest only enough to make sure I wasn't contradicting anything later on. But I never read all the way through to #12. So, while waiting for the contracts to come I re-read the series only to realize I had actually forgotten about 90% of it. I didn't remember characters I wrote or scenes, etc. I was coming to it as a reader and I was surprised at how complex it was.
But I re-read it and made notes along the way, and as I continued to read it ideas came and I saw places in the original that weren't explained and places that more story could be done that would give what we saw a different impact.
NRAMA: In the larger picture, did you feel that you were going to be able to capture the scope of the comic series in a novel form, or was the overall structure going to need to be rejiggered for the novel?
MW: I realized I could not do in prose what George did with art in reference to the grand cosmic nature of the story with hundreds of heroes attacking hundreds of villains in all different time periods. What I wanted to do was what a novel does best, which is to make the ultimate cosmic story into a personal story. I wanted to have Flash as our POV character because, although he died in the middle of the series - something I never wanted to do - he really got short shrift in the original. I also thought it would be good to do a book where the Flash was basically letting us know how a hero sees the other heroes, how he saw the Crisis in general, and how his own emotions were turned up side down because he had no idea if his wife Iris was alive or dead. In many ways this book is a wonderful love story between Barry and Iris and I dare anyone who reads it not to cry at the end. I described the last chapter to my wife - who has not read the Crisis or most comics, for that matter, and she was in tears. Also, using Flash gave me the chance to do something very different, to make it special and to really get into the head of a major DC character in a way nobody ever had before.
I pitched the plot concept to DC and they completely agreed with the approach. I worked with Paul Kupperberg as my editor and Bob Greenberger, who was my assistant on the original series, worked alongside Paul. They were just great and Paul made a suggestion at the end that really helped the book.
NRAMA: What was it about Barry that made you want to use him as the POV character? As you said, he died in the middle…which could make it…tricky for him to relate what was happening at the end of the story.
MW: He was moving through time in the original comic. Part of the question is why and how. And that leads into other aspects that make him the perfect POV character to work with. Also, it let me really get into the heads of all the characters in a way we couldn't do in the comic.
NRAMA: So, with your approach and POV set, was it smooth sailing from there?
MW: Not at all. The task was daunting for two reasons: First, this was the Crisis and I felt I had to do something special if I was going to dip into that well again. The original Crisis was extremely well received by most fans and professionals. In many ways it's become the standard for all crossovers to come, and its success is what made the crossover comic a comics staple - for which in many ways I am deeply apologetic. But whether you like the idea of crossovers or not, Crisis was the first and its success spawned an entire industry.
Second, I was intimidated because I hadn’t written a novel in 30 years, and it took me awhile to begin to get comfortable with the format, but I think it worked out really well. I'm hoping that others agree because I really caught the novel bug with this and want to do more.
I re-read the comic again and made more notes on the original and slowly I saw an entirely new way to handle the series which would invalidate nothing from the original but still show much of it from a completely new view point. I found openings in the story that let me do some really interesting things with both the story and the characters.
But more importantly it would allow me to write a lot of new material that nobody had ever seen. I honestly think it all fits in seamlessly and provide some new perspective on what we saw or in some cases what we thought we saw.
NRAMA: That said, how much is in the
Crisis novel is expansion or building on what was in the original series versus the maxiseries’ storyline?
MW: I'm guessing that about 60-70% of the book is new. We cover many of the original scenes, and of course we have the death of Supergirl - but also from a very different view point - Supergirl's own - as well as Flash's death, the Anti-Monitor's attacks, etc. But, if I'm not mistaken and it is doing what I think it’s doing, the new material doesn't just fit in but it explains and adds to the original. I was amazed at how different I could be while not altering what was there. Remember, most of the book is narrated first person by the Flash and that alone changes the perspective of what we saw.
NRAMA: On your blog, you mentioned that the novel begins with Barry Allen (The Flash) already dead…he’s able to still be the narrator because of the time-jumping?
MW: Right. The book opens with Barry's death and him trying to figure out what happened. Remember, in the Crisis the Flash was moving back and forth through time, so that allowed him to go back to before he was involved and stick around after he was dead.
NRAMA: In looking back and re-reading the original, was there anything that you took the opportunity to fine tune or tighten up in the novel? Any minor bugs that you were able to explain away or tweak?
MW: I did that, but only incidentally. The main thrust of the novel was to do a really good story that would not only amplify the original Crisis but to show a side of it we didn't show before. Lots of hows are solved but more importantly lots of characters are fleshed out in I hope surprising ways.
NRAMA: Is any of the new material scenes and elements you originally wanted to include, but couldn't, for space reasons? Or is the new material fully "new" in the sense that it's coming to the story after you've had 20 years to think about it?
MW: Unlike
Crisis #4.5 which was based on a not-fleshed out idea I couldn't fit in to the original, none of these scenes were intended or thought of before this book. The separation of 20 years and my hopeful growth as a writer let me see things and approaches I could take.
I tried to write it so that folk who read the original
Crisis maxi-series will find lots of new things to discover, be surprised at or infuriated by, while people who have never read a single issue of it or any other DC Comic would simply find it an interesting yarn. I'm sure people will tell me very loud and vociferously if I failed.
NRAMA: So let’s start with those teases - what are some of the new scenes?
MW: There are so many, but here's a very few: Green Lantern in Australia.
Wonder Woman on Paradise Island. Superman-2 and Lois-2. How did the
Flash escape from the Anti-Monitor's trap – which was never explained in the original. How did the Spectre get involved? The Flash actually is responsible for the origin of one of DCs other characters. The Flash at the dawn of time. There are scenes in Atlantis before and after it sunk, and during World War 1 which happens to be taking place just outside San Diego in the present.
To me what is even more important is what's happening to the characters than just the addition of new scenes. Jon Stewart is new to the JLA and to hear his observations of his fellow members adds to his character and to theirs. Robotman of the Doom Patrol has a picnic with his fellow Patrol partners - knowing he's in some past time period and they are soon about to sacrifice themselves. To see Lois-2 waiting for her husband to announce his retirement and to feel what the Flash is going through as he tries to find out what happened to Iris, to explore the major differences between Superman and Supergirl because Supergirl was a teenager when she watched her world, her parents and her best friends die as opposed to Superman who was rocketed from Krypton while he was still an infant, these are the kinds of touches that I think give the book a character driven reality it might not have had before.
But most of all I'm hoping everyone finds it readable, fun and a good story. Of course, right now, as I'm waiting for the book to come out the middle-end of April, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that I remembered to write it in English.
NRAMA:In your view now, is this novel as "canon" as the original series was?
MW: Since I don't invalidate anything in the original Crisis - I'm showing the comic from different perspectives and showing many, many events that were never shown before - I don't think it's anti-canonical. I think it's a fleshing out of the original with lots more than just that.
NRAMA: In the end, what, for you, is the larger story of
Crisis? It’s been said that, at its heart, it’s one of utter defeat, that trillions of beings died, heroes died, the Anti-Monitor almost won, and the heroes were only able to save a small beachhead of reality. Do you see it as…pessimistic as that?
MW: Allowing for the fact that this is, above all, a story, and getting so deep into the deaths is, in my mind counter-productive, if you follow my logic you'll see that that theory is wrong. The heroes went back and changed the universe at the dawn of time. There was supposed to be only one universe and that's all there is now. Therefore the people who 'died' in the Crisis actually never existed in the first place. And if they never existed - since the change happened at the dawn of time - they couldn’t die. The heroes solved the problem by ensuring the one universe concept, and then they attacked and beat the Anti-Monitor. They absolutely were heroes. The battles with the Anti-Monitor after the change had the heroes winning every step of the way.
I hate playing these comic games and you can never win when you're dealing with time paradoxes, but assuming this was real and not fiction, if the universe was reset at the dawn of time none of us would ever remember our previous existences because they never happened.
My idea was by beginning the universe all over again we could begin anew. If we wanted to bring back something from DC’s past then we would - but as something new. It would be that things first appearance in the new world. Supergirl may have died when there was a multiverse, but in the single universe there had never been a Supergirl. But a rocket from Argo City could still land in Metropolis and a new Supergirl could emerge from it, become Linda Lee, become Superman's secret weapon, etc. The Crisis was a way of allowing the DCU to begin with all new number ones and all the good stuff could be brought back if we wanted, or ignored if we wanted that instead. To me it was a method of relaunch and not one of death which is why, except for Flash who I didn't want to kill for totally fan reasons, I never concerned myself much with who lived and who died.
Wolfman is doing periodic teases of some of the new Crisis material on his blog at http://www.marvwolfman.com The novel is available for pre-order at www.amazon.com and other booksellers.