PDA

View Full Version : Stuart Moore's A THOUSAND FLOWERS, part 5 - Comics Drunken Uncle, pt 2


MattBrady
11-19-2002, 07:28 AM
<center><a href="http://www.newsarama.com/Thousand_Flowers_index.htm"><img src="http://www.newsarama.com/flowers/flowers_banner.jpg" width="475" height="75" border="0"></a></center>



<img src="http://www.newsarama.com/flowers/astounding0952.jpg" width="175" height="239" align="right"><center>A THOUSAND FLOWERS</center>
<center>Comics, Pop Culture, and the World Outside</center>
<center>Installment 5</center>
<center>by Stuart Moore</center>

5. Comics’ Drunken Uncle: Science Fiction (part two)

In our previous thrilling <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=3&t=000006" target="_blank"> installment</a>, Uncle Hugo -- the author’s oh-so-clever stand-in for the field of science fiction -- finally had a real heart-to-heart with his nephew, Comics. Between belts of Scotch, Uncle Hugo admitted that, while he’d sometimes been ashamed of Comics, he saw a lot of himself in the youngster. Having discussed the similar relationships the two had with their respective fandoms, Hugo nodded off to sleep and Comics crept quietly out of the room. Now the poor kid’s come back for more…

**

“There is no way in which a contemporary audience -- even the contemporary audience for ‘serious’ fiction -- can understand the degree of humiliation and self-revulsion many science fiction writers suffered until at least the mid-nineteen-sixties.”
--Barry N. Malzberg, ENGINES OF THE NIGHT

Sound familiar?

There’s a certain…defensiveness…on the part of long-time comics readers. It creeps into professionals’ discussions, too. The world doesn’t take us seriously -- why not?

When comics people get into this discussion, the answers they come up with are usually twofold and somewhat contradictory. On the one hand, it’s because the world is too stupid. On the other, it’s because so much of what we publish is crap. If only we could dump all that garbage and only publish JIMMY CORRIGAN, then they’d like us. Unless…unless they’re just too stupid…

Welcome back to Uncle Hugo’s parlor.

When I began reading science fiction in the 1970s, it was an axiom of the field -- repeated virtually everywhere -- that good science fiction had started with John W. Campbell Jr., editor from 1938 to 1971 of ASTOUNDING STORIES, which became ANALOG and is still published today. In ALTERNATE WORLDS, James Gunn wrote, “The dozen years between 1938 and 1950 were ASTOUNDING years. During these years the first major science fiction editor began developing the first modern science fiction magazine, the first modern science fiction writers, and, indeed, modern science fiction itself.” Jack Williamson, whose first sf story was published in 1930 and who astonishingly is still writing, wrote in 1975: “John Campbell has been, by common consent, the greatest of our editors.”

Before about 1950, most category science fiction appeared in the magazines, which were the main driving forces in the field. Book publication usually came later, if at all. And among the magazine editors, Campbell was indeed the leader, at least for those first dozen years he helmed ASTOUNDING. (Later he became overly enamored of crackpot scientific theories, and most of ANALOG’s fiction got pretty dull.) Campbell imposed a certain rigor of logical thought on his writers, and cultivated some of the finest writers of the ‘40s, most notably Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, Theodore Sturgeon, and A.E. van Vogt.

In 1949-50, two new magazines challenged ASTOUNDING’s reign. As Williamson said: “Horace Gold was more liberal than Campbell, with less concern for gadgets and more for man’s future psychological and cultural evolution. Gold’s GALAXY became as exciting as ASTOUNDING had ever been…[and] THE MAGAZINE OF FANTASY AND SCIENCE FICTION led the field in wit, style, and sheer literary quality.”

This progression -- Campbell’s ASTOUNDING to the more literary works of the ‘50s GALAXY and F&SF -- again became part of the accepted wisdom. In the ‘60s, the field fragmented with the arrival of sf’s “new wave,” a loose movement that brought experimental literary techniques to the field. Over the years, this was refined and synthesized into cyberpunk and various other movements.

I’m generalizing wildly, of course -- it’s not within the scope of this column to present a comprehensive history of science fiction. The point is this: Through all this change, sf pros and fans still felt that same inferiority complex, that obligation to defend science fiction to the outside world at every opportunity. And part of that defense involved openly, publicly sneering at the field’s more “primitive” examples -- most notably the works of E. E. “doc” Smith.

<img src="http://www.newsarama.com/flowers/firstlensman.jpg" width="175" height="239" align="left">Smith’s SKYLARK and LENSMAN books were unabashed, huge-scale, crazy adventure fiction. The “science” in them was ridiculous, even for the time (the ‘30s and ‘40s); the characterization was, er, primitive; and the writing was…well…let’s just say clunky. (I was going to quote a sample here, but it would be too long -- Smith said nothing briefly.) But the scale, the motion, the sheer sense of wonder was unmatched. Small wonder the Lensman series became the inspiration for a major Silver Age superhero -- more on that next time.

Old-style sf has arguably moved primarily into TV and films at this point -- but it survived in print for years, much of it in “pulpier” magazines than ASTOUNDING. The late Leigh Brackett, a pioneering space-opera writer, is probably best known today as the co-writer of THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK which, like the entire STAR WARS series, was heavily influenced by early prose sf. In Brackett’s introduction to THE BEST OF PLANET STORIES #1, she wrote: “It was fashionable for a while, among certain elements of science-fiction fandom, to hate PLANET STORIES. They hated the magazine, apparently, because it was not ASTOUNDING STORIES, a view I found ridiculous at the time, and still do…ASTOUNDING went for the cerebrum, PLANET for the gut, and it always seemed to me that one target was as valid as the other.”

Still…for years, it just wasn’t right to enjoy “doc” Smith, to enjoy PLANET STORIES. It wasn’t respectable. It didn’t further the cause of science fiction.

Just as it’s not respectable today, in certain quarters, to enjoy superhero or “mainstream” comics.

But the market didn’t care. Smith’s books sold for decades…right there on the shelf next to Ursula LeGuin, Frank Herbert, and yes, Isaac Asimov. (They don’t sell as well now…but the decline of the backlist in category fiction is another, huge topic that, unfortunately, we don’t have room for here.)

<img src="http://www.newsarama.com/flowers/startstor0549.jpg" width="175" height="239" align="right">There’s one big difference between comics and sf that I haven’t mentioned yet. Comics is a medium; sf is a genre. From a marketing standpoint, comics are more analogous to books as a whole than to sf as a category. There have been very few sf-only bookstores, and I don’t think there’s more than one or two left in the country at this point.

So let’s look at comic book stores for a minute. There’s a lot of debate today about what makes a “good” comic store. Some people say you should throw out the superheroes, or at least hide them in the back, and push the indy stuff, whether it sells or not. Others say you should lead with the current big sellers. Obviously it depends on local clienteles; and the broader the spectrum of product you carry, the more careful you have to be about ordering nonreturnable items.

But I’ve never seen the harm WOLVERINE does to EIGHTBALL. Bookstores sell both potboiler fiction and time-tested works of literature; record stores carry Britney Spears and the latest indy bands (good record stores, anyway). Nobody avoids a Virgin Megastore because there’s a big ‘Nsync poster in the window. It’s where you buy records!

And nobody ever avoided the science fiction section because doc Smith or Perry Rhodan were in there stinking it up. If you wanted Philip K. Dick, Cordwainer Smith, or Samuel R. Delany, they were there.

Why should comics be any different?

**

Oh, god. Uncle Hugo’s awake again:

“So that’s it, kid. We ain’t so different, you an’ me. Y’know? We ain’t so different. Hey! Where y’goin’?

“I know, I know…I promised to talk about the connections between comics and sf, about the talented guys who crossed between the two fields over the years. I’ll get to it next time, I promise. You got no patience, you know that? If it don’t fit in 22 pages, you just don’t get it.

“You’ll come back an’ see old Uncle Hugo again, won’t you? Look here. ASTOUNDING. FANTASY & SCIENCE FICTION. William Gibson. That’s the good stuff. Never mind those doc Smith books in the closet. I’m respectable! Respectable, I tell you!

“Is he gone?

“Aaaah…PLANET STORIES…”

**

Stuart Moore has been a writer, a comics editor for Vertigo and Marvel Knights, a kitchen worker, a book editor, and the nighttime manager of the Lawrenceville, NJ Woolworth's curtain department. He has won the Will Eisner award for Best Editor 1996 and the Don Thompson Award for Favorite Editor 1999.

Currently Stuart freelances as a writer of comic books and nonfiction; he’d like you all to go out and buy ZENDRA, his epic science fiction series from Penny-Farthing Press. Issue #4 of the second series, ZENDRA: HEART OF FIRE, is on sale now, and the trade paperback ZENDRA 1.0: COLLOCATION collects the first series. Then you can go to Stuart’s message board at <a href="http://www.joequesada.com" target="_blank">http://www.joequesada.com</a> and discuss ZENDRA, this column, or anything else on you like. But please -- no filk songs!

Francis Barel
11-19-2002, 10:54 AM
Great column, as always!
Still wondering why so many people look down on the super-heroes...

Ed Cunard
11-19-2002, 10:58 AM
Wow. Stuart. He hits the nail on the head this one...

As a frequent message board poster/lurker, I've noticed that there's always the fight between the "cape fetishists" (I love that phrase, even if I don't agree with it) and the indy fans.

I never thought of the bookstore/record shop analogy before... it's absolutely perfect.

linnen
11-19-2002, 11:04 AM
you know, speaking of sci-fi...

i just re-read the helix series "vermillion" last week, and once again i felt incredibly ripped off that a lack of support forced the early cancellation of the book!

what a great series that was, and i'm sure that if it had run it's course, it would have been even better. i really miss having a title like that on my monthly pull list.

gOgIver
11-19-2002, 11:08 AM
EIGHTBALL & STRAY BULLETS are the only Independent books I buy now. For most of the 90's most of the comics I bought were Independent, Black & White comics. From the Pacific North-West for the most part. Now that the Indy creators have infiltrated the Main-Stream of comics, I see very few top quality Independent comics compared to 10 years ago.

PopCultureKid
11-19-2002, 11:18 AM
Yeah, I absolutely agree. The idea that the comic industry could, or should, try and survive without it's bestselling genre is ridiculous. The trick is to make every genre accessible. This industry just hasn't figured out how...yet.

Frank
11-19-2002, 11:29 AM
[quote]Originally posted by Francis Barel:
<strong>Still wondering why so many people look down on the super-heroes...</strong><hr></blockquote>

I don't think so many people look down on superheroes today. What I've found is that most people are turned off by the dense backstory. There was a point, just a few years ago, when picking up a random issue of X-Men would be like dipping into The Brothers Karamazov somewhere in the middle.

And then, y'know, the capes and multi-colored underwear.

I know very few people who were able to get into reading superhero comics unless they read them as kids.

Ed Cunard
11-19-2002, 11:53 AM
[quote]Originally posted by Frank:
<strong>
I know very few people who were able to get into reading superhero comics unless they read them as kids.</strong><hr></blockquote>

And yet, Spiderman has been the highest performing film of the year.

Obviously, the market is there. What is it that prevents people from looking at words and pictures on a page in comic book form? Especially those who go and read the sunday comics in their local newspaper...

Francis Barel
11-19-2002, 11:56 AM
Frank,

Yes, I agree, the problem has always been continuity and backstory... However, I am already wondering how in 5 to 7 years the Ultimate continuity will work. I'm really a big fan of all things Ultimate... However, it's always easy to start from scratch... But already with more than 2 years worth of backstory, it's hard to follow some subplots... But that's the beauty of the genre: to build on the past; and to ask the readers some effort on their parts!

Ultra0
11-19-2002, 12:36 PM
The idea of new readers being turned off by dense backstory always seemed ridiculous. A lot of TV shows run with dense backstory yet still seem to attract new audiences and stay on the air. The best example would be the soap opera, which drops you into the middle of the plot (and all of the dangling sub-plots) without a reference to anything. They just expect you to play "catch-up". I see comics no differently. We tend to dumb down our medium too much then wonder why no one takes us seriously.

Todd VerBeek
11-19-2002, 01:30 PM
[quote]Originally posted by Ultra0:
<strong>The idea of new readers being turned off by dense backstory always seemed ridiculous. A lot of TV shows run with dense backstory yet still seem to attract new audiences and stay on the air.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Primetime shows actually have a difficult time of this. Ratings tend to run like direct-market sales, with boffo numbers for the debut and ever-dwindling audiences after that. The networks will quickly cancel anything that doesn't start strong enough in the ratings, because they know how hard it is to get a show's numbers up. It usually takes a major "event" or guest stars or new characters to draw viewers (usually lapsed viewers) in. And even that often fails. Any of this sound familiar?

[quote]<strong>The best example would be the soap opera, which drops you into the middle of the plot (and all of the dangling sub-plots) without a reference to anything. They just expect you to play "catch-up".</strong><hr></blockquote>

Have you ever sat and analysed soap exposition? They spoon-feed you everything you need to know to follow what's happening. "But Mary, if you keep the baby that your ex-boyfriend Kyle fathered, that witch Kathryn that he's married to now will tell your father Randy, and you don't want him to cut off your allowance again like he did when he caught you sleeping with Kathryn!" "Steph, I'm going to marry Brian, and since he can't have children of his own after he nearly froze to death in Nepal, I want to have a baby for him to raise!" Just like the traditional comics-scripting rules of always using the hero's and villain's name on the first page in which they appear, recapping earlier stories, etc. No scene lasts more than a couple minutes, to avoid boring the viewer. Even prime-time dramas are resorting to recaps ("previously on The West Wing...") like those that used to grace the first page(s) of multi-part comics stories. This isn't a writing style I'm eager to see gain dominance in comics (again).

Ongoing continuity and sub-plots are a somewhat desperate attempt just to hold onto existing viewers/readers... because most primetime TV series producers know they'll hardly ever get new ones.

Cheers, Todd

gwangung
11-19-2002, 01:47 PM
To add to this, primetime TV depends on backend syndication for the bulk of their revenue generation; very, very few primetime shows make money on their initial runs on network TV. And it's very hard for a continuity-heavy show to make money in syndication...

Hm. Wonder what the parallels are to the syndication market to comics' trade paperback market...same? Vastly different?

MattBrady
11-19-2002, 01:50 PM
[quote]Originally posted by gwangung:
<strong>Hm. Wonder what the parallels are to the syndication market to comics' trade paperback market...same? Vastly different?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Gut level, I'd say very similiar - by the time you get to both trades and syndication, you've already paid your production costs, so the publisher/network/studio gets the bulk of the revenue (minus printing, royalties and distibution...)

Good analogy.

Matt

Taylor Porter
11-19-2002, 01:50 PM
I usually find these columns to be a little pointless. Too few facts to be a historical essay, yet too few opinions to be an opinion essay. This one was the best yet, I think, although I still think it's a little vague. I'm hoping they continue to get better, though.

BoyWonder
11-19-2002, 02:03 PM
[quote]Originally posted by Ultra0:
<strong>The idea of new readers being turned off by dense backstory always seemed ridiculous. A lot of TV shows run with dense backstory yet still seem to attract new audiences and stay on the air. </strong><hr></blockquote>


You do have a point. When I started reading Batman I did play catch-up and found Year One, Year Two, borrowed all the Alan Grant Detective issues from a friend, borrowed a Death in the Family etc. It was part of the fun.

The Key is a story needs to be understandable by itself. The backstory must always appear as optional.

To Stuart Moore: I would be interested to know your opinion on Star Wars and it's effect on comics in the late 70's. In Britain it coincided with the launch of 2000Ad. Did Star Wars save the comic industry? If Marvel still did Star Wars would we have a Joe Quesada designed Dark Lord of the Sith? How many issues would that shift? would he be called Darth Ultimate? :)

I have to say these articles are really fun. Very different from everything else that is on the comic book websites.

Stuart Moore
11-19-2002, 02:21 PM
Since my cable modem just got fixed, a few responses...

Todd: I agree totally regarding expository dialogue. I think recap pages are a great idea, though. The trick is to keep them concise and focus only on what's necessary, so it doesn't seem like a new reader has missed more than he has. On BUFFY, they don't recap every bit of of Giles's backstory if it's not important to the episode.

For more on the fan/continuity issue, see the previous column. They're archived here: <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum&f=3" target="_blank">http://www.newsarama.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum&f=3</a>

Linnen: VERMILLION was a favorite of mine, too. Glad to hear it's remembered fondly.

BoyWonder: Hmm...STAR WARS. That should figure into a future column...when we get to the '70s...!

Thanks, everyone. This column gets great commentary.

Best,
Stuart

Gail Simone
11-19-2002, 02:33 PM
This is becoming one of my all-time favorite comics commentary columns, Stuart. Excellent stuff.

Gail

samnoir
11-19-2002, 04:10 PM
Another great column!

I'm looking forward to hearing your insights about the Helix line of comics from DC.

I think a collection of these columns would be a great reference volume someday.

__________________________


<a href="http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=samurainoir&completed=0&sort=3&since=-1&include=0&page=1&rows=25" target="_blank">Large, Detailed Super Deformed GODZILLA Bank for sale on eBay. </a>

<a href="http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=samurainoir&completed=0&sort=3&since=-1&include=0&page=1&rows=25" target="_blank">1978 Hardcover Dr. Who Annual for sale on eBay. Tom Baker!</a>

csGuy
11-19-2002, 04:12 PM
[quote] I am already wondering how in 5 to 7 years the Ultimate continuity will work. I'm really a big fan of all things Ultimate... However, it's always easy to start from scratch... But already with more than 2 years worth of backstory, it's hard to follow some subplots... But that's the beauty of the genre: to build on the past; and to ask the readers some effort on their parts! <hr></blockquote>

In regards to this, reviews for Ultimate Spider-Man are almost always ultra-positive, and I'm always tempted to pick up the latest issue when I hear its praises but a lot of the time i feel as though I've missed out on too much material already to make picking up the issue worthwhile.
Oddly enough though, I only mostly have this "completist" mentality about the Ultimate line. These concerns don't really affect other books, I would readily pick up new arcs of Batman, X-Men or Amazing. Odd... I KNOW.

SCI-FI and Comics.
A big difference between sci-fi and comics, I think, is that comics are serialized. If I hear about a sci-fi series that sounds interesting, I usually have no reservations about picking it the first book and trying it out. The rest of the series (if its a series at all) is usually 4-10 books all around 10$ Canadian. The relatively smaller amount of books to track down and pay for, makes picking up sci-fi series easier than a comic book series.

If I told someone to read the Ender series by OSC, all they'd have to do is find "Ender's Game" (unless they want to start in book 4 "Children of the Mind", in which case they're weird :) )at the local Chapters for 10$ and read it. On the other hand, if I told someone to read "Preacher" they'd have to go out and get the first TPB which is something like 30$. Or get the first issue, which is probably pretty expensive and hard to find.


Thai - who's fingers are tired.

Michael P
11-19-2002, 04:21 PM
The first Preacher TPB is more like $15. I can't think of a TPB outside the recent Star Wars reprints that runs over $20.

csGuy
11-19-2002, 04:27 PM
[quote] The first Preacher TPB is more like $15. I can't think of a TPB outside the recent Star Wars reprints that runs over $20. <hr></blockquote>

Canadian...

Bob_W
11-19-2002, 04:30 PM
Interesting column as always Stuart.

Just for the record, Jack Williamson's first published story was in 1928, not 1930. Not a big deal, but since Jack has stories appearing in print this year, he's one of the few authors on record who's sold fiction in 9 decades.

bob w.

Wade @ Sighnub.com
11-19-2002, 05:22 PM
I have to say I always enjoy these columns, but this is the first time where one really made me want to throw my two cents in.

[quote] Just as it’s not respectable today, in certain quarters, to enjoy superhero or “mainstream” comics. <hr></blockquote>

Laughable, yet sad and true. There is a tendency among comics readers to go gung-ho one way or the other isn't there - at least among the vocal minority. I would extend it also to those who say only European or Japanese comics are any good and American books suck.

I have been repeatedly dumbfounded when reading interviews with "indy" stars about how superheroes should go the way of the dodo. "They do nothing for the longevity of the industry."

I feel fairly confident saying that no one would be reading or publishing Eightball or Milk & Cheese or other "indy" books if there hadn't first been a Superman, Spider-man or even Millie the Model.

I can enjoy books in all sort of different comic book genres because it is the medium and method of storytelling that I enjoy. And the great thing about that is that I don't think that attitude makes me better than anyone else...superhero fan or indy reader.

Can't we all just get along....

John Osen
11-19-2002, 05:46 PM
Agreed! :D

Stuart Moore
11-19-2002, 06:16 PM
Thanks for the correction on Jack Williamson, Bob. That was about the only date I wrote down from memory...I knew I should have checked it. An amazing career indeed.

Sam: I doubt I'll discuss Helix here...first of all, I'm hopelessly biased on it; and second, this column is mostly historical in nature. But we'll see.

CSguy: That is an interesting difference, yes. And it's a good argument for free website samples of comics material.

Best,
Stuart

Todd VerBeek
11-19-2002, 08:18 PM
[quote]Originally posted by Stuart Moore:
<strong>I doubt I'll discuss Helix here...first of all, I'm hopelessly biased on it; and second, this column is mostly historical in nature.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Well, Helix is (as they say) "history"... {wry grin}

But you're right: you're probably too close to address it with credible perspective.

Amadeo G.
11-20-2002, 12:32 AM
Hi, my first post!
I'm from Argentina and sometimes the problems the american comic industry faces now are very similar to the ones the industry in my own country faced. Many years ago we used to have a great comics industry, very much alike the american industry, comics sold a lot and were bought by almoust everyone. But something happened and since the 60's figures started to go down and down. The "guetto mentality" started to settle in and somehow comics appealed to fewer and fewer people. Nowadays the industry is practically gone and most of our artists are forced to work outside (for example Marcelo Frusin, Eduardo Risso and Jorge Lucas). No doubt the economic crisis and political unstability helped but the result comes mainly from closing in and not trying to reach out to the bigger public and also from the fact that only nowadays some of the most important works are being collected for a new generation to see and appreciate. I think that the american comics industry is doing some things right, most of all reprinting comics in trade paperback format but i also think that what they should keep and encourage is diversity. You can't get rid of superheroes altogether because it's proven that they have an audience, you should try to diversify and try to reach to people with different tastes.

On a slightly different note I'm always surprised to see how closed on themselves american readers are. It surprises me to notice that only nowadays they are begining to discover japanese and european comics. I think it's a good thing that they are opening themselves to these different kinds of comics because they only add up to the diversity of these wonderful medium.

Well, i think that's all. Kinda long for a first post...thanks and bye.

Hellboy15
11-20-2002, 05:32 AM
On the subject of foreign comics, I can never understand why so many people, and especially people comics have a hard time reaching, specifically teenagers and Females, will sit and check out every Manga on the shelves but not take a second look at the american books that are sitting right next to them. The books may be a different size, but its all comics. And it can't just be the style, because there is as much difference between Appleseed and Dragonball as there is between Appleseed and Transmetropolitan.

Stuart Moore
11-20-2002, 11:33 AM
I just posted some comments on Helix on my message board, in response to a query. It's in the thread called "And another new column." The link:

<a href="http://www.joequesada.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=3ddbaafc6237ffff;act=SF; f=4" target="_blank">http://www.joequesada.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=3ddbaafc6237ffff;act=SF; f=4</a>

Best,
Stuart