View Full Version : JiC: THREE LEAGUES OF EXTRAORDINARIES
MattBrady
05-12-2003, 06:30 AM
<img src="http://www.newsarama.com/DC/league.jpg" width="185" height="285" align="right" border="0">by Michael Sangiacomo
This column is about three very different leagues of extraordinary gentlemen (and ladies.) The fifth and penultimate issue of the second volume of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (Wildstorm/America’s Best Comics/DC, $3.50) is an occasion for both sadness and joy. Joy because Alan Moore’s story about a group of disparate fictional heroes of the Victorian era is just so amazing and sad because it’s coming to an end.
The Martians of H.G. Well’s War of The Worlds have attacked. The Earth and rivers run red with blood and Martian dreck as the league members fight among themselves or love each other into oblivion. In addition, Moore gives eight tightly written text pages of “TheNew Traveller’s Almanac,” a weird guide to strange lands that we’ve heard about in fables, stories and songs. The last issue should come out just about the time of the release of the film version of the League starring Sean Connery.
UNCANNY X-MEN
Speaking of films, as of this writing, the second X-Men movie had pulled in $155 million bucks its first weekend. That’s pretty darn impressive. With all this attention being paid to the X-Men and to Nightcrawler it’s about time that Marvel fixed that weird, wonky storyline that expects us to accept that Nightcrawler had become a priest.
When it was announced last year that he had somehow been ordained a priest in the six months between issues, the whole thing seemed fishy. No one is ordained a priest in any legitimate religion after six months of training.
Granted, he never said he was a Roman Catholic priest, though I did get that impression. I don’t know about other religions, but Catholic priests get ordained after years in the seminary, seven if I remember my basic religion classes. It’s not like he was a priest in Billy Bob’s Bible Belt Baptist Church and Bait Shop, he had a big old church building and the works.
Now, in Uncanny X-Men #423, (Marvel, 25 cents!) writer Chuck Austen cleans up the little untidy mess created by another writer. In the first part of two-part story, “Holy War,” Nightcrawler realizes that something’s funky with his liturgical memories. Glad to see that little piece of X-weirdness taken care of in a logical fashion.
<img src="http://www.newsarama.com/DC/jsa_cvr.jpg" width="185" height="285" align="left" border="0">JSA ALL STARS
It’s no surprise that the last of the three league comics is JSA All Stars #1, one of the best books of the week. This one opens with JSA leader Sand trying to convince the new Icicle to change his evil ways and join the good guys, but as the villain puts it, “I already belong to a team.”
Which is a cue for a rescue by Solomon Grundy and the Injustice Society.
But it’s all a set-up for a major league bad guy named Legacy who has it in for the five remaining members of the original JSA: Flash, Hawkman, Sentinel (Green Lantern), Wildcat and the Spectre. David Goyer and Geoff Johns team up to write the main story of the eight-issue mini-series. Back up solo stories will be written by some pretty impressive people including Pulitzer Prize winner Michael Chabon and the story and art team of Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale.
It’s gonna be a good summer. And fall.
Michael Sangiacomo is a statewide news reporter for the Plain Dealer newspaper in Cleveland, Ohio. His syndicated "Journey Into Comics" weekly column on the state of the comic book business, can be found in newspapers and at the Newsarama website. His monthly comic book column appears the first Saturday of each month in the Plain Dealer Arts page and is syndicated through Newhouse Newspapers. He also writes a twice-monthly audiobooks review column covering crime thrillers and mysteries that can be seen at <a href="http://www.audiobookstoday.com" target="_blank">www.audiobookstoday.com</a>. He currently is developing Nowhere Man for Marvel’s Epic imprint.
RotSman
05-12-2003, 07:04 AM
Maybe we were just supposed to accept that Nightcrawler had went to school in Marvel's "compressed time?" I'm glad that they'll be dealing with this hanging thread as well...when they put the X-Men back in their costumes and I decide to give the books another try, it will be nice if they've definitively dealt with this.
Now if only they'd get Larroca back on X-TREME X-MEN....
Matt
<a href="http://www.infiniteplayground.com" target="_blank">http://www.infiniteplayground.com</a>
jawaplumber
05-12-2003, 07:29 AM
Didn't pick up the JSA thing, but I admit it looked pretty cool. The art by Sal Velutto was nice, and from the sounds of things, there is some neat character stuff going on in it.
Haven't had a chance to read the new League, but it's in my stack beside my bed :)
UNCANNY was far better than the entire previous two issues. And thanks, Mike, for the info about Nightcrawler's shady ordainment. Honestly, I came back to X-Men late into Casey's run last year, having been away from the X-books for many, many years, so this was news to me.
IanZL
05-12-2003, 11:47 AM
I'm sorry, but Austen really messed up here. Making Nightcrawler a preist was a really clever idea. I mean, what better way to further connect him and his religion? Yeah, it didn't make a whole lot of sense but big freaking deal, the idea of a super-hero priest is pretty cool if you ask me.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MattBrady:
<strong>
Now, in Uncanny X-Men #423, (Marvel, 25 cents!) writer Chuck Austen cleans up the little untidy mess created by another writer. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">How diplomatic of you . . . :D
--J.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by IanZL:
<strong>I'm sorry, but Austen really messed up here. Making Nightcrawler a preist was a really clever idea. I mean, what better way to further connect him and his religion? Yeah, it didn't make a whole lot of sense but big freaking deal, the idea of a super-hero priest is pretty cool if you ask me.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Gotta disagree with you here Ian. I think the idea of a Super-Hero Priest is pretty damn silly. Besides when you start bringing religion into comics so heavily, it can come off as "preachy."
And can someone explain Cyclops erratic behaviour in said issue? And I think it's ridiculous that whenever someone dies, then can just get hooked up to Archangel & come back to life. Bah. I am not enjoying Austen's run on the book . . .
--J.
whoME?
05-12-2003, 04:28 PM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by KACH:
QUOTE]Gotta disagree with you here Ian. I think the idea of a Super-Hero Priest is pretty damn silly. Besides when you start bringing religion into comics so heavily, it can come off as "preachy."[/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It would only come off as preachy in the hands of a shitty writer. A skilled writer can deal with the religion without making it sound like a sermon.
Arashikage Ninja
05-12-2003, 04:34 PM
Austen's Uncanny has been hit or miss with me. Hope started off well, and I like certain elements of stories here and there, but otherwise it's been kind of "bleh." But when I enjoy him I really enjoy him. Has anyone else been reading Superman: Metropolis? I don't know why, but I am in love with that book.
jawaplumber
05-12-2003, 05:32 PM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Arashikage Ninja:
<strong>Austen's Uncanny has been hit or miss with me. Hope started off well, and I like certain elements of stories here and there, but otherwise it's been kind of "bleh." But when I enjoy him I really enjoy him. Has anyone else been reading Superman: Metropolis? I don't know why, but I am in love with that book.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">SUPERMAN: METROPOLIS is the only DC book I read other than BATMAN, and I love it, too. Finally, the potential of the B13 tech in Metropolis is finally being taken advantage of in a clever and creative fashion, plus a great spotlight for Jimmy Olsen.
jawaplumber
05-12-2003, 05:33 PM
please ignore, this was a double post!
mc (_(\/)_)achete
05-12-2003, 08:02 PM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by KACH:
<strong>I think it's ridiculous that whenever someone dies, then can just get hooked up to Archangel & come back to life. Bah.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I agree. that's too easy of a cop out. i hope anyone who gets "revived" suffers some sort of side-effect or that this healing nonsense is temporary. when you tread too close to being invincible, you lose suspense and get boring. ask superman.
Doug Smith
05-13-2003, 06:46 PM
Quote: the second X-Men movie had pulled in $155 million bucks its first weekend.
Sorry to be nitpicky, but this isn't correct. The movie made about $89 mil its first weekend, and was at about $149 mil after its second weekend.
$155 million in its first weekend would have been much more than darn impressive! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
Otherwise, a very nice article. Not many people have good things to say about Austen's work on "Uncanny" so it's refreshing to see somebody with something positive to say.
And Ian and Kach? I'm telling Joe Q that you're cheating on him. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
Doug Smith
05-13-2003, 07:20 PM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by mc (_(\/)_)achete:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by KACH:
<strong>I think it's ridiculous that whenever someone dies, then can just get hooked up to Archangel & come back to life. Bah.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I agree. that's too easy of a cop out. i hope anyone who gets "revived" suffers some sort of side-effect or that this healing nonsense is temporary. when you tread too close to being invincible, you lose suspense and get boring. ask superman.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I agree with this too, but I have a theory on this:
One of the things that's bothered me about Chuck Austen's run on "Uncanny X-Men" is this silly new power of Arcangel's to heal people. I don't like having a healer on a team on general principle. It eliminates (or at least greatly reduces) the possibility that our heroes could be killed in the line of duty, and provides the writer with a convenient "out" for any potentially mortal situations. It allows the writer to set up what appear to be dramatic situations, but really aren't:
"Oh no, Husk is dying! No wait, Warren healed her."
"Oh no, Juggernaut is dying! No wait, Warren healed him."
"Oh no, Jubilee is dead! No wait, Warren healed her."
"Oh no, Skin is dead! No wait...oops, well, win some lose some."
So, I don't like the healing ability.
BUT....
I started thinking about it, and maybe there is more to this than meets the eye?
Consider the following:
Jubilee and the other crucified mutants were dead. Not injured, not on their death bed. DEAD. You don't heal the dead. But you can resurrect the dead.
Consider this: Warren Worthington is codenamed Arcangel. He resembles an angel (his original codename). Even moreso now that his skin is no longer blue (and why did Austen do that? Could there have been a reason after all?). A beautiful blonde Adonis with feathered wings growing out of his back.
Consider this: Austen is setting up the Church of Humanity to be a major foe of the X-Men. Austen is peppering his writing with Biblical passages, images of crucifixions, and an overall feeling of heavy religious overtones. He's also addressing Kurt's role as a priest.
I think...and I may need to put the crack pipe down...but I think he is setting Warren up to become a messiah figure. Resurrecting the dead? Is that not a major giveaway? As if his angelic appearance wasn't enough.
I really think that Warren may end up becoming a Christ-like religious figure in the X-Men books.
Now, if that is what Austen is up to (and I may be giving him more credit than I should as a writer), here is the next question: would he have the guts to take this storyline to its logical conclusion? Would he be willing to actually have Warren sacrifice himself for the salvation of others, and thus become a holy martyr to mutants (and maybe humans as well?). Killing off an original X-Man is a major move if he does it...but I could actually see this leading to that at some point.
So, what do you all think? Am I out of my mind? Am I grasping at straws in an attempt to find some greater meaning to Austen's writing?
ManifestFury
05-13-2003, 07:49 PM
Doug,
Archangel has already been "crucified" to save his fellow mutants... remember "Fall of the Mutants?"
Alan Coil
05-14-2003, 02:39 AM
Jawaplumber---do not read League Ex. Gents before you go to sleep.
KACH---just to make it clear to anyone skimming through, the article was written by Sangiacomo, but was posted by Brady.
Michael Sangiacomo---while your statement was that Nightcrawler becoming a priest was a "mess created by another writer", I really think the biggest part of the blame should go to the editorial department. They approved the plot and cleared the book to go to the printer.
I think that a lot of comics creators would become even better talents if they had better editors. This is true at Marvel and DC and most of the smaller companies. And I do know that all of the editors can't be Archie Goodwins. But at least they could try to get better at their jobs.
MattBrady
05-14-2003, 07:46 AM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Doug Smith:
<strong>Quote: the second X-Men movie had pulled in $155 million bucks its first weekend.
Sorry to be nitpicky, but this isn't correct. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, it is. As <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=00057 0" target="_blank"> reported</a> widely, the film brought in an estimated $155 worldwide on its opening weekend.
MattB
Doug Smith
05-14-2003, 11:40 AM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MattBrady:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Doug Smith:
<strong>Quote: the second X-Men movie had pulled in $155 million bucks its first weekend.
Sorry to be nitpicky, but this isn't correct. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes, it is. As <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=00057 0" target="_blank"> reported</a> widely, the film brought in an estimated $155 worldwide on its opening weekend.
MattB</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My apologies, Matt and Mike. I was thinking domestic gross, as that is what is traditionally reported when talking about box office figures. You are correct. :o
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.