hjcho
04-18-2004, 01:54 PM
I finally got around to reading this. Despite all the hype, it wasn't at the top of my pile. Reading through this book, I was reminded of an assignment I had back in the day when I was a freelancer. I was put on a three issue story arc to fill in for an artist who was running behind, and the writer was someone whose work I was familiar with. I liked some of his stuff but didn't really cast a critical eye until I actually had to draw his story. It was a frustrating experience, because the script was full of all sorts of gratuitous flourishes af violence and sex that really did not contribute to the story, and there were all sorts of absurd plot twists. However, I couldn't just blow this stuff off because at the core of the story was a good idea, and I had to work hard to maintain that thread of narrative. I think I really failed miserably, and it was a challenging and unpleasant experience.
Reading through Ultimates vol. 1, I had the same feeling. Millar's writing is flawed, in some ways very deeply, but at the core there is a good story that is sometimes or often obscured by the window-dressing. IN updating the Avengers, he has constructed an interesting concept that is richer and more complex than the original "super-friends" premise. Each member has his or her own agenda, and they obviously are not congruent. The overall sinister element of government sponsorship pervades the story. It is an interesting and believable way to bring together such disparate characters.
Unfortunately, this gets mired down in a lot of extraneous, gratuitous bullshit. First and foremost, Millar does not or cannot write female characters. Whether this is a conscious choice, a professional shortcoming, or a reflection of mysogyny, the end result is the uniform portrayal of emasculating, unfaithful harpies who get their asses kicked eventually. This is a theme that repeats in most of Millar's work that I've seen, although beyond this and Authority, that is admittedly not a large amount.
Second, after reading this volume I have to come down on the side of those who disfavor "decompressed" storytelling. This six issue story could have been trimmed to four at least, if not three. There are too many scenes that are extended for no particularly good reason. Many conversations extend well beyond that which is useful. It feels padded.
Third, the gratuitous hollywood namedropping gets very tedious. Millar is s smart man, and he is working more angles than just telling a good story, but this becomes akin to product placement. Why not just tell yer damn story and wait until the movie option to start pimping?
Overall, the story was good even if padded, and I really liked his portrayal of Stark and Thor. I appreciate that Millar was going for a fresh take on the characters. Obviously I thought the female characters sucked, and I didn't care for his take on HUlk and Cap. That's merely a matter of taste, for this story they were appropriate, but I didn't like them, particularly Cap. The conservative Might-Makes-Right Cap didn't jibe with me. I don't think the Sentinel of Liberty would kick a man when he was down, villain or otherwise.
The big plus of this book is Bryan Hitch's remarkable pencils. He really turned on the juice for this book, and while I personally do not think there is any excuse for delays of several months, I didn't have to wait so I can just admire the great pages without ire. His work here compares very favorably with early Neal Adams. I have minor quibbles with some of the storytelling and layouts, but technically this stuff rocks on all fours.
I'll probably move on to vol. 2 sooner rather than later, if only to see some more great art. I suppose we can look forward to vol. 3 sometime in 2006.
Overall: C+ (story) A (art)
Reading through Ultimates vol. 1, I had the same feeling. Millar's writing is flawed, in some ways very deeply, but at the core there is a good story that is sometimes or often obscured by the window-dressing. IN updating the Avengers, he has constructed an interesting concept that is richer and more complex than the original "super-friends" premise. Each member has his or her own agenda, and they obviously are not congruent. The overall sinister element of government sponsorship pervades the story. It is an interesting and believable way to bring together such disparate characters.
Unfortunately, this gets mired down in a lot of extraneous, gratuitous bullshit. First and foremost, Millar does not or cannot write female characters. Whether this is a conscious choice, a professional shortcoming, or a reflection of mysogyny, the end result is the uniform portrayal of emasculating, unfaithful harpies who get their asses kicked eventually. This is a theme that repeats in most of Millar's work that I've seen, although beyond this and Authority, that is admittedly not a large amount.
Second, after reading this volume I have to come down on the side of those who disfavor "decompressed" storytelling. This six issue story could have been trimmed to four at least, if not three. There are too many scenes that are extended for no particularly good reason. Many conversations extend well beyond that which is useful. It feels padded.
Third, the gratuitous hollywood namedropping gets very tedious. Millar is s smart man, and he is working more angles than just telling a good story, but this becomes akin to product placement. Why not just tell yer damn story and wait until the movie option to start pimping?
Overall, the story was good even if padded, and I really liked his portrayal of Stark and Thor. I appreciate that Millar was going for a fresh take on the characters. Obviously I thought the female characters sucked, and I didn't care for his take on HUlk and Cap. That's merely a matter of taste, for this story they were appropriate, but I didn't like them, particularly Cap. The conservative Might-Makes-Right Cap didn't jibe with me. I don't think the Sentinel of Liberty would kick a man when he was down, villain or otherwise.
The big plus of this book is Bryan Hitch's remarkable pencils. He really turned on the juice for this book, and while I personally do not think there is any excuse for delays of several months, I didn't have to wait so I can just admire the great pages without ire. His work here compares very favorably with early Neal Adams. I have minor quibbles with some of the storytelling and layouts, but technically this stuff rocks on all fours.
I'll probably move on to vol. 2 sooner rather than later, if only to see some more great art. I suppose we can look forward to vol. 3 sometime in 2006.
Overall: C+ (story) A (art)